![]() |
|
|
| PHONE: (925) 449-9927 WEB ADDRESS: www.lhg.org |
|
NEWSLETTER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Photo Courtesy C. G. Clarke There were several projects in the Dublin-Tassajara region in later years but none developed producing wells. The exciting part of the wildcatting venture with which the public was mostly concerned had to do with financing and leasing. It is almost impossible to believe the wide extent to which news of the Livermore operations reached. It brought in money from many hopeful investors. The Independence Oil Co. was organized in 1909 and its records show a total of 148 stockholders with addresses as widely divergent as San Francisco, Oakland, Sacramento, San Mateo, Lackawana, N.Y., Princeton, NJ., Richmond, VA., New York City, Long Island, N.Y., and other places in California. There were 17 from Gloucester, MA, and six from Boston, plus several more in Massachusetts cities. The reason was set forth in the obituary of W.W. French, Livermore stockholders numbered 36. The company had special claim to fame in that one of these Livermore stockholders was Battling Nelson, then world's lightweight boxing champion. He had trained in Livermore and bought property here. It can be safely said that no stockholder ever made a dollar on his investment, except those who sold to other investors. |
"The Derrick", a San Francisco oil paper, published a two-page story on the Livermore field on December 28, 1908. "Money Talks", a financial publication in San Francisco, featured Livermore oil in an article published about the same time. The Livermore Chamber of Commerce received many requests for information by mail and telephone. The Los Angeles Times on October 31,1908, said that San Francisco was excited over reports that the Daisy well had struck oil. Most of the wells were located by qualified oil men but in at least 2 instances clairvoyants called on the spirits to decide where wells would be "spudded in". Leases were the one source of revenue from which owners of ranch property throughout the eastern section of the Valley profited. However, in some instances leases became highly involved, resulting in clouds on land titles and the owner wished they had never heard of an oil lease. From $ 1 to $2 a year was the going price per acre for leases. Some were for one year, some for three. The Standard Oil Co. had leases on 6,000 acres when it started drilling at Altamont and wanted' 30,000 acres. An unnamed oil company claimed to have 4,000 acres under lease in 1908 near the site of the abandoned Brown Ranch well. The Livermore-Coalinga Oil Co. had leases on 1,100 acres in the eastern part of the valley when it planned to start drilling in 1908. When the Standard shut down operations at Altamont in 19 10, it abandoned most of-its leases but retained those on aline between its well and the Alisal. A.M. Gilstrap held leases on 5,000 acres in 193 1 in the Paterson Pass area. The California Corporation Commission moved into the picture in December 1927, ordering the Pacific Oil Leasing Co. to stop its traffic in oil leases. Pacific's was allegedly charged with operating without a permit, making an exorbitant profit and that its activities were against the best interests of the community. The commission also said that Calhoma, which was not operating at the time, would be restrained if it attempted to resume operations without a permit. Landowners alleged that Pacific and Calhoma had leased drilling rights for $1 an acre and sold them throughout the country at from $5 to $100. They said that in subleasing these rights the companies had so confused land titles that many suits have had to be instituted in court by owners who were forced to prove their legal title to their own land. Fraudulent boring operations were also charged, such as keeping a rig in operation without actually drilling to impress prospective lease buyers visiting the well. |
|
|
|
|
Twelve companies were selling oil leases in 1927. The following year tow unusual operators made their appearance, Chief and Princess Redwing of Oklahoma announced they had bought 160 acres and would start 32 wells, one to each five acres. They did not give the location of the land, and there is no record off further action on their part. Information on shares of stock issued by the various companies was always at a minimum and never dependable. Financing was always in a chaotic condition, price of shares rising with each rumor of oil being struck and falling as the rumors proved false. There were also many reorganizations, each having an influence on the value of stocks. The general trend is shown by what happened with the Daisy well, more data being available on that drilling project than any others, and still very |
meager. When a rumor developed in October 1908, that oil ha been struck shares brought 26 cents to 31 cents on the San Francisco Oil Exchange, a substantial increase. In May 1909, the company was reorganized, W.J. Rhoads, the driller, retaining controlling interest with 25 1,000 shares and the balance, amount not revealed, sold at 10 cents. More than a year later, in September 19 10, there was another rumor or oil being struck and work was stopped to test the showing. The company was acquiring more land and the stock had advanced to 25 cents a share, stockholders doing the buying to increase their holdings. In November 1911, the Independence required additional capital, $3,500 subscribed in Livermore raising the price of shares to 25 cents. In June 1910, the W.M. & S. issued an additional one million shares, the price not being given. |
|
|
|
|
Promoters often resold their stock at higher figures, some fantastic, up to$ 100 a share, as advantage was taken of the proclivity of certain types of persons to plunge in oil and mining stocks in the hope of cashing in, this despite a total lack of knowledge of oil drilling or in mining. Assessments were frequent, causing distress to stockholders, who expected their stock to skyrocket in value rather |
than remaining at a low figure and being subjected to assessments. The story on the Alisal well is the most complete on assessments. Since the well was locally financed, information on its operation was more available and of greater interest in Livermore. In September 1903, the 15/3 levied assessment No. 9 at 2 cents a share, indicating eight previous assessments on which no information had been made public. |
|
June 30, 2001